Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida[SUP]1[/SUP]
J.P. Cuda, J.C. Medal, D.H. Habeck, J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo and M. Vitorino [SUP]
2[/SUP]
Brazilian peppertree,
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae), also known as Christmasberry, Florida Holly, and aroeira (Brazil), is an aggressive, rapidly colonizing invasive weed of disturbed habitats, natural communities and conservation areas in peninsular Florida (Cuda et al. 2004, 2006). Native to Argentina, Paraguay and Brazil, Brazilian peppertree was introduced into Florida as a landscape ornamental in the late 19th century (
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FW037 )
. The popularity of Brazilian peppertree as an ornamental plant can be attributed to the numerous bright red drupes (fruits) produced during the October to December holiday season (Figure 1). Grown as a substitute for the more traditional English holly (
Ilex aquifolium L.), Brazilian peppertree was common in cultivation in Florida during the first half of the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century. However, this relative of poison ivy was a rare component of the native flora in Florida until the late 1950s when the first naturalized plants were discovered in Monroe County.
Figure 1. Leaves and fruit of Brazilian peppertree.
Credits: A. Murray, University of Florida, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants (used with permission).
Brazilian peppertree currently dominates entire ecosystems in southcentral Florida (Cuda et al. 2006). It is considered an important invader of theEverglades National Park, and poses a significant threat to ongoing Everglades restoration efforts. Once established, Brazilian peppertree quickly displaces the native vegetation, often forming dense monocultures that reduce the biological diversity of plants and animals in the invaded area. Although herbicides (
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AA219 ) and mechanical or physical control practices (e.g., cutting, burning and flooding) are routinely used often in combination for controlling existing stands (
http://ipm.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/BPmanagPlan.pdf), these conventional methods are expensive, labor intensive and provide only temporary control due to the plants regenerative capacity. Furthermore, non-selective chemical and mechanical controls are unsuitable for sensitive natural areas (e.g., coastal mangrove forests) because they can have negative effects on non-target species and increase water pollution. Minimizing the use of herbicides and other non-selective control practices is needed to maintain the integrity of Florida's fragile environment and natural resources. Biological control- the introduction of host-specific natural enemies into Florida that are capable of selectively damaging Brazilian peppertree- will accomplish this goal.
In the 1980s, Brazilian peppertree was identified as a suitable target for introductory or classical biological control (Habeck et al. 1994). Biological control is an appropriate management tactic because the invasive characteristics exhibited by Brazilian peppertree are consistent with the enemy release hypothesis (Williams 1954). The key elements of this hypothesis are that (a) native host specific enemies strongly control the abundance and distribution of native plants; (b) escape from host specific enemies is a key contributor to exotic plant success; and (c) enemy escape benefits exotic plants because they gain a competitive advantage over native plants as a result of being liberated from their herbivores. Also, because no close relatives of Brazilian peppertree occur in the US, the potential for non-target damage by approved biological control agents would be low.
Several insects have been identified from exploratory surveys conducted in Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay as potential biological control agents of Brazilian peppertree (Habeck et al. 1994, Hight et al. 2002, Cuda et al. 2006, McKay et al. 2009). The following insects were selected for further study because they visibly damage the plant in its native range and were collected only from Brazilian peppertree or a few closely related species during field surveys.
Brazilian Peppertree Thrips, Pseudophilothrips ichini
The biology and field host range of
Pseudophilothrips ichini (Hood) (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) were studied in southeastern Brazil (Garcia 1977).
Pseudophilothrips ichini has not been observed feeding on plants other than Brazilian peppertree in it native range (Garcia 1977, J. H. Pedrosa, pers. observ.). Because this thrips was found attacking only Brazilian peppertree in field surveys, Garcia (1977) suggested that
P. ichini might be a good candidate for biological control of this invasive weed. Recently,
P. ichini was found to be a complex of two cryptic species (Cuda et al 2009, Mound et al 2010).
The life cycle of
P. ichini begins when the female deposits her eggs on the leaves of the plant. After hatching, the immature thrips undergo two larval instars that are the active feeding stages. The wingless larvae are red or orange in color (Figure 2). As soon as the larval feeding phase is completed on the host plant, the remainder of the life cycle occurs in or on the soil. Unlike other families of the Thysanoptera that have only two pupal instars (the propupa and pupa), thrips belonging to the family Phlaeothripidae that includes
P. ichini are unique in that they undergo three non-feeding pupal instars (the propupa, pupa I and pupa II) instead of two (Mound and Marullo 1996). Although these developmental phases are not true larvae or pupae, these terms are commonly used to describe the immature stages in a thrips life cycle.
Figure 2.
Pseudophilothrips ichini, a thrips that kills the shoot tips of Brazilian peppertree. Adult female (left); larvae on young stem (right).
Credits: (adult) M. Vitorino, University of Blumenau; (larvae) D. H. Habeck, University of Florida.
Adults of
P. ichini are black, winged, and relatively small (3-6 mm) (Figure 2), but have a high reproductive rate.
Pseudophilothrips ichini is polyvoltine; up to four generations per year have been observed in Curitiba, Brazil, and it is considered a common species in its native range (Garcia 1977). Mating is not required to produce offspring. Unmated females deposit eggs that develop only into males whereas mated females produce eggs that develop into females (Mound and Marullo 1996). This form of parthenogenetic reproduction is called arrhenotoky.
In Brazil, the adults overwinter on Brazilian peppertree. In early spring (September), females start laying eggs singly or in small groups on the leaflet pedicels and blades, or on the new tender shoot growth. The duration of the immature stages is variable, depending on climate and other factors. The larvae hatch from the eggs in 7-8 days at 24 [SUP]o[/SUP]C. The first and second instars last 6 days and 11-12 days, respectively. The two-nonfeeding prepupal and pupal stages require ~ 8 days to complete their development. After transformation to the adult stage, females undergo a 5 to 15 day preoviposition period, and can oviposit up to 220 eggs during their lifetime (45-78 days). Duration of the complete life cycle for
P. ichini is temperature dependent. According to Garcia (1977), the life cycle from egg to egg was completed in 76 days at 18 [SUP]o[/SUP]C, and 38 days at 24 [SUP]o[/SUP]C. Under laboratory conditions, females lived on average 78 days at 23.1 [SUP]o[/SUP]C when maintained in vials provided with food.
Both the larval and adult stages damage the plant. Larvae of
P. ichini usually are found clustered around the stem of a tender shoot (Fig. 2). They feed by rasping and sucking the plant sap, which frequently kills the growing tip. Adults are usually found on the new unfolding leaves where they feed, mate, and oviposit. Although they can be more randomly distributed on the plant, adults usually are found aggregated with the developing larvae. Adults also will feed on the flowers, causing them to abort. This type of feeding damage can inhibit seed production in mature plants and has beeen shown to reduce the growth rate of younger plants (Furmann et al. 2005). In addition, there is anecdotal evidence suggesting that feeding damage by
P. ichini promotes infection by plant pathogens that contributes to shoot death (R. Barreto, pers. comm.).
The laboratory host range of
P. ichini was investigated in an approved Florida containment laboratory (Cuda et al. 2009). A petition to release
P. ichini from quarantine was initially prepared and submitted to the federal interagency Technical Advisory Group for the Introduction of Biological Weed Control Agents, or TAG (
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ENY828 ) in November 1996. Request for release from quarantine was initially denied because the biological and host range testing data presented in the original petition did not adequately address the risk to native Caribbean plant species and to the closely related California peppertree,
Schinus molle L., a common introduced ornamental in southern California. A new petition to release the thrips in Florida was prepared and resubmitted to the TAG in October 2002 (Cuda et al. 2002). The revised petition adequately addressed all of the concerns raised by reviewers in the earlier petition, and the TAG recommended field release of
P. ichini in May 2007.
Brazilian Peppertree Sawfly, Heteroperreyia hubrichi
Heteroperreyia hubrichi Malaise (Hymenoptera: Pergidae) is a primitive non-stinging wasp native to northern Argentina and southeastern Brazil. The biology, ecology and host range of the sawfly
H. hubrichi were investigated in Brazil, Florida, and Hawaii (Vitorino et al. 2000, Medal et al. 1999, Hight et al. 2002, Cuda et al. 2005). The larval stage of this insect is phytophagous (plant feeding). The adults are black with yellow legs (Figure 3), and the ***es can be separated on the basis of size (females are larger), the presence of the ovipositor in females, and also antennal morphology. Field data collected in Brazil indicate this species is bivoltine (2 generations per year). *** ratio of the adults is approximately 1:1 (males to females) when reproduction is bi***ual, but the sawfly also exhibits arrhenotoky; mated females produce females and unmated females produce only males. In Brazil, a pupal diapause period occurs in the summer (December to February) and winter (June to August).
Figure 3.
Heteroperreyia hubrichi, a defoliating sawfly of Brazilian peppertree. Adult female guarding egg mass inserted into stem (left); gregarious larvae feeding on leaflet (right).
Credits: J. C. Medal, University of Florida.
Upon emergence from the pupal stage, females mate and/or oviposit in young woody branches that are adjacent to the more tender terminal shoots. This behavior enables the sawfly to avoid the toxic resin common in the Brazilian peppertrees terminal growth. The female uses her saw-like ovipositor to cut the stem tissue and insert her eggs between the thin bark and the phloem (Figure 3). The eggs are elliptical in shape, and are deposited side by side in long rows of variable length and number. Females exhibit maternal behavior by guarding the egg masses during the incubation period, but die as soon as the first larvae hatch.
The period of egg maturation is about 15 days. The number of eggs is directly linked to the size of egg mass. The average number of eggs per mass is ~ 100. Females prefer to oviposit on plants that are < 3 m in height, and select young branches with a diameter between 2.5 to 5 mm for oviposition. In Brazil, the majority of sawfly egg masses (76.5%) occurred on plants with hairy leaves (varieties
pohlianus and
rhoifolius). However, in laboratory and greenhouse studies, sawflies readily accepted var.
raddianus, the smooth variety of Brazilian peppertree that commonly occurs in Florida.
The larvae are bright green with a black head capsule (Figure 3), and have red areas at the end of abdomen and adjacent to the head capsule in the last two instars. The larval stage has seven instars in the females and six in the males. The duration of the larval stage (from emergence of the neonate larvae to pupation) is 45 days. The pre-pupal phase is characterized by the change in the size of the last instar larvae (25% smaller), and cessation of feeding. In this phase, the larvae burrow in the soil to a depth ranging from 3 to 4 cm to pupate. The pupation chamber acquires the color of the surrounding soil, and is ~ 1 cm in length, and ~ 0.5 cm in width. The pupal stage lasts from 1 to 5 months, with an average of 4 months.
The larva of
H. hubrichi is the damaging stage. Developing larvae are voracious leaf feeders (Figure 3), and can cause complete defoliation of Brazilian peppertrees depending on the size of the plant and quantity of larvae present. This type of feeding damage could severely injure or kill young plants and prevent older plants from reproducing, which would reduce the competitive advantage that Brazilian peppertree currently holds over native vegetation. In Brazil, it is not uncommon to find Brazilian peppertree shrubs and more rarely trees completely defoliated by the sawfly. Larvae are gregarious in the early instars, and feed in groups on tender leaves mainly on new shoots. When the larvae reach the third instar, they disperse over the plant and attack leaves of all age classes.
Since the entire life cycle from adult to adult can be completed in less than 4 months under ideal conditions, this insect may be capable of producing two or three generations per year in central and south Florida where Brazilian peppertree is a severe problem. Simulated herbivory studies conducted under field conditions in south Florida over a 2-year period have shown that growth and reproduction of Brazilian peppertrees are severely impacted when the plants are subjected to multiple defoliations within the same growing season (Treadwell and Cuda 2007).
The TAG recommended field release of the defoliating sawfly
H. hubrichi in Florida in 1997. However, a release permit was not issued by APHIS PPQ because of concerns raised about toxins present in the larvae, which could have a negative impact on native fauna if the larvae were ingested.
Brazilian Peppertree Leaflet Roller, Episimus unguiculus
Episimus unguiculus Clarke, previously known as
E. utilis Zimmerman (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), was introduced into Hawaii for classical biological control of Brazilian peppertree in the 1950s (Krauss 1963). Martin et al. (2004) investigated the biology of
E. unguiculus in the process of establishing a laboratory colony for conducting host range tests in an approved Florida containment laboratory. Adults (Figure 4) are small, grayish brown moths with distinctive markings on the forewings. When at rest, the adults are cryptically colored, resembling either tree bark or bird droppings. ***es can be readily separated without magnification by examining the wing pattern. Average life span for the adult moths is 8 to 9 days, and development from egg to adult stage occurs in about 42 days.
Figure 4. Adult (top) and mature larva (bottom) of
Episimus unquiculus, a leafrolling moth introduced into Hawaii for biological control of Brazilian peppertree.
Credits: Photo of larva by M. Fukada, Hawaii Department of Agriculture. (Used with permission).
Females can deposit up to 172 eggs during their lives. Eggs are usually deposited singly but occasionally in groups of up to six eggs on the upper and lower surfaces of Brazilian peppertree leaflets. The eggs, which are glued to the leaflet, are compressed, ovoid, and light green in color with a smooth chorion when first deposited but darken as they develop. The thin, scale like shape and transparency of freshly deposited eggs probably afford them some protection from predation and possibly parasitism.
The caterpillar (or larval stage) of
E. unguiculus (Figure 4) attacks the foliage of Brazilian peppertree. Early instars are tan to light green in color but as they reach maturity, the larvae turn bright red before pupating and are approximately 15 mm long. The larval stage has 5 instars although a 6[SUP]th[/SUP] instar may occur on occasion.
Feeding habits of the larvae vary depending upon their age. Newly hatched larvae and early instars feed by scraping the surface of the leaflets. Early instars are leaflet tiers, and normally feed between young and expanding leaflets that have been tied together with silk. The 1[SUP]st[/SUP] to 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] instars typically web together two or more adjacent leaflets flat against each other. Older larvae bind single leaflets into the characteristic cylindrical roll that is usually associated with
E. unguiculus in nature. A cohort of approximately 35 larvae is capable of completely defoliating a 0.5 m tall Brazilian peppertree potted plant in less than 3 weeks (Martin et al. 2004). The results of a recent study by Manrique et al. (2009) showed that high levels of defoliation by
E. unguiculus significantly reduced the number of leaflets, plant height, foliar biomass, relative growth rate (RGR) and shoot: root ratio of potted Brazilian peppertrees. Moreover, plants were not able to recover from the effects of the herbivory after 2 months.
Unlike the sawfly
H.
hubrichi that pupates in the soil and is vulnerable to flooding and possibly ant predation, mature larvae of
E. unguiculus pupate in the tree canopy inside rolled leaflets attached to the plant. Pupae are brown in color with the head, appendages and wings darker than the abdomen.
In Hawaii, where it was released in the 1950s,
E. unguiculus is widely distributed on Brazilian peppertree, but the insect apparently is not sufficiently abundant to severely damage the plant (Yoshioka and Markin 1991, J.P. Cuda 2002, personal observation). The ineffectiveness of
E. unguiculus as a biological control agent in the Hawaiian Islands may be due in part to biotic mortality factors unique to that environment. For example, two wasps that were introduced into Hawaii for classical biological control of the sugar cane leafroller
Hedylepta (=
Omiodes)
accepta (Butler) were discovered attacking
E. unguiculus soon after it was released against Brazilian peppertree (Krauss 1963).
Although satisfactory biological control of Brazilian peppertree by
E. unguiculus was not achieved in the Hawaiian archipelago, this failure should not preclude the introduction of the insect into Florida.
Episimus unguiculus could be a more effective biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree in Florida because it would be introduced into a new environment where biotic mortality from introduced and native parasitoids and predators may be less severe in Florida compared to Hawaii. Host range testing has been completed and a release petition was submitted to the TAG in Setember 2009.
Brazilian Peppertree Stem Boring Weevil, Apocnemidophorus pipitzi
Surveys conducted recently in northern Argentina (McKay et al., 2009), and southeastern Paraguay revealed the presence of several new natural enemies of Brazilian peppertree. Among these were two species of stem boring weevils belonging to the genus
Apocnemidophorus Hustache. The weevils resemble bird droppings.and immediately drop off the plants when they are disturbed. Adults of
Apocnemidophorus pipitzi (Faust) were collected in southeastern Paraguay and imported into a Florida containment laboratory in April 2006. According to Wibmer and O'Brien (1986),
A. pipitzi is native to Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. An examination of weevil specimens deposited in the entomology museum of the Federal University of Parana in Curitiba, Brazil, revealed that collections of
A. pipitzi have been made in the states of Parana, Santa Catarina, and Minas Gerais. The occurrence of
A. pipitzi in Paraguay is a new country record for this species
The adults range in size from 4 to 7 mm in length and are grayish brown in color, with live specimens often appearing more creamy than grayish (Figure 5). A thick patch of white scales is clearly visible on the sides of the pronotum and is less pronounced on the underside of the abdomen. Other parts of the body have just a few scattered areas with white scales. There also are several patches of black scales over the elytra which are generally clearly visible under magnification, giving the elytra (forewings) a slightly mottled appearance.
Figure 5. Egg, larva, pupa and adult male of the weevil Apocnemidophorus piptzi. The larvae mine the stems and the adults feed on the leaflets of Brazilian peppertree.
Credits: Lyle Buss, University of Florida.
The ***es of A
. pipitzi are readily distinguishable. According to C. W. O'Brien (person. comm.), there are obvious differences in the rostrum (snout) and antennal insertion in males and females of
A. pipitzi. The females have an evenly curved relatively uniformly cylindrical rostrum with no difference in diameter or curvature at the antennal insertion. In contrast, the males have a strong dorsal expansion at the antennal insertion and the rostrum is narrowed beyond the insertion and strongly angled ventrally and dorsally flattened. This is evident even in very small specimens. Other species of the genus, some very similar in appearance, do not have such obvious male differences in the rostrum.
The life stages of
A. pipitzi are shown in Figure 5. The adults are long–lived, surviving in the laboratory for almost 2 months. Females chew small holes (ca. 0.5 mm) into the stems and then insert their ovipositors into the cavities. After depositing an egg (or multiple eggs), they seal the cavities with a frass plug that initially is bright green in color but eventually turns brown. The entire process lasts approximately 45 minutes. In the laboratory, a new generation of weevils emerged from cut stems of Brazilian peppertree in 3 to 4 months. The length of the life cycle suggests that multiple generations of
A. pipitzi would be produced annually if this insect were approved for release in Florida.
Both the adults and larvae of
A. pipitzi are capable of damaging Brazilian peppertree. Adults feed preferentially on the tender, subterminal leaflets of the plant. The characteristic feeding scars produced by the adults generally do not completely perforate the leaflets, causing a thin, translucent layer of plant tissue or “window” to remain. However, leaflets that sustain heavy feeding damage eventually abscise. The larvae (Figure 5) tunnel extensively just under the bark of BP (in the vicinity of the cambium) until they reach the pupal stage. This type of feeding damage can weaken the plant because it interferes with the normal transport of water and nutrients in the xylem and phloem tissues.
References
Cuda J.P., A.P. Ferriter, V. Manrique, and J.C. Medal (eds.). 2006. Florida's Brazilian peppertree management plan, 2nd edition: Recommendations from the Brazilian peppertree Task Force, Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, April 2006. Available at
http://ipm.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/BPmanagPlan.pdf.
Cuda, J.P., D.H. Habeck, S.D. Hight, J.C. Medal, and J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo. 2004. Brazilian Peppertree,
Schinus terebinthfolius: Sumac Family-Anacardiaceae, pp. 439-441. In E. Coombs, J. Clark, G. Piper, and A. Cofrancesco (eds.), Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
Cuda, J.P., J.C. Medal, J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo, and D.H. Habeck. 2002. Request for field release of a nonindigenous thrips
Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) for classical biological control of Brazilian peppertree,
Schinus terebinthifolius(Anacardiaceae), in Florida (Submitted to IFAS and TAG October 2002). 53 pp.
Cuda, J.P., J.C. Medal, J.L. Gillmore, D.H. Habeck, and J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo. 2009. Fundamental host range of
Pseudophilothrips ichiisensu lato (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), a Anacardiaceae) in the USA. Environ. Entomol. 38: 1642-1652.
Cuda, J.P., J.C. Medal, M.D. Vitorino, and D.H. Habeck. 2005. Supplementary host specificity testing of the sawfly
Heteroperreyia hubrichi,a candidate for classical biological control of Brazilian peppertree,
Schinus terebinthifolius, in the USA. BioControl 50: 195-201.
Furmann, L.E., J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo, J.P. Cuda, and M.D. Vitorino. 2005. Efeito da liberação no campo de
Pseudophilothiprs ichini no desenvolvimento de
Schinus terebinthifolius. Floresta 35: 241-245.
Garcia, C.A. 1977. Biologia e aspectos da ecologia e do comportamento defensiva comparada de
Liothrips ichini Hood 1949 (Thysanoptera Tubulifera). M.S. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.. 75 p.
Habeck, D.H., F.D. Bennett, and J.K. Balciunas. 1994. Biological control of terrestrial and wetland weeds, pp. 523-547.
In D. Rosen, F.D. Bennett, and J.L. Capinera (eds.), Pest Management in the Subtropics: Biological Control- a Florida Perspective. Intercept, Andover, United Kingdom.
Hight, S.D., J.P. Cuda, and J.C. Medal. 2002. Brazilian peppertree. Pages 311-321
in R. Van Driesche, B. Blossey, M. Hoddle, S. Lyon, and R. Reardon (eds.). Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States. US Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, FHTET-2002-04.
Krauss, N.L.H. 1963. Biological control investigations on Christmas berry (
Schinus terebinthifolius) and emex (
Emex spp.). Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 18: 281-288.
Manrique, V. J. P. Cuda, and W. A. Overholt. 2009. Effect of herbivory on growth and biomass allocation of the invasive Brazilian peppertree (Sapindales: Anacardiacea) seedlings in the laboratory. BioControl Sci. & Tech. 19: 657-667.
Martin, C.G., J.P. Cuda, K.D. Awadzi, J.C. Medal, D.H. Habeck and J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo. 2004. Biology and laboratory rearing of
Episimus utilis (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a candidate for classical biological control of Brazilian peppertree,
Schinus terebinthifolius(Anacardiaceae), in Florida. Environ. Entomol. 33 1351-1361.
McKay, F., M. Oleiro, G.C. Walsh, D. Gandolfo, G.S. Wheeler, and J.P. Cuda. 2009. Natural enemies of Brazilian peppertree (
Schinus terebinthifolius: Anacardiaceae) from Argentina: their possible use for biological control in the USA. Florida Entomol. 92: 292-303.
Medal, J.C., M.D. Vitorino, D.H. Habeck, J.L. Gillmore, J.H. Pedrosa, and L.D. De Sousa. 1999. Host specificity of
Heteroperreyia hubrichiMalaise (Hymenoptera: Pergidae), a potential biological control agent of Brazilian Peppertree (
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi). Biological Control 14: 60-65.
Mound, L.A., and R. Marullo. 1996. The thrips of Central and South America: an introduction (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Memoirs Entomol. International 6: 1-487.
Mound, L.A., G.S. Wheeler, and D.A. Williams. 2010. Resolving cryptic species with morphology and DNA; thrips as a potential biocontrol agent of Brazilian peppertree, with a new species and overview of
Pseudophilothrips (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa 2432: 59-68.
Treadwell, L.W. and J.P. Cuda., J.P. 2007. Effects of defoliation on growth and reproduction of Brazilian peppertree (
Schinus terebinthifolius). Weed Science 55: 137-142.
Vitorino, M.D., J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo, and J.P. Cuda. 2000. Biology and specificity tests of the sawfly –
Heteroperreyia hubrichi Malaise, 1955 (Hymenoptera: Pergidae) a potential biological control agent for Brazilian peppertree-
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae).
In: N.R. Spencer (ed.), Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, 4-14 July 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA. USDA, ARS, Sidney, Montana and Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana. pp. 645-650.
Wibmer, G.J. and C.S. OBrien. 1986. Annotated checklist of the weevils (Curculionidae
sensu lato) of South America (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Mem. Amer. Entomol. Institute 39. American Entomological Institute, Gainesville, FL.
Williams, J. R. 1954. The biological control of weeds. - In: Report of the Sixth Commonwealth Entomological Congress, London, UK, pp. 95-98.
Yoshioka, E.R., and G.P. Markin. 1991. Efforts of biological control of Christmas berry
Schinus terebinthifolius in Hawaii. pp. 377-385.
In T. Center et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the symposium of exotic pest plants, 2-4 November 1988. Miami, FL.
Footnotes
1.
This document is ENY-820 (IN114), one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: September 1999. Revised: July 2010. Please visit the EDIS Website at
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
2.
J.P. Cuda, J.C. Medal, D.H. Habeck, Entomology and Nematology Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611; J.H. Pedrosa-Macedo, Federal University of Parana, Laboratory of Forest Protection, Curitiba, Brazil and M. Vitorino, University of Blumenau, Blumenau, Brazil.